BANNER


Part 1: The Three Fronts in Relation to the Events of the Boston Marathon Bombings: An Overview

We will take the last strategy first, acts of barbaric terrorism to instill fear and destroy Western resolve, along with any actual loss of life that may occur. Recall that in an earlier article I referred briefly to the Muslim student with permission to be here as a source of mystery; now we know about the deliberate deception by the government, which has close ties to the Saudi Arabian government because of its perceived necessary source of oil and somewhat murky political intrigues. The Saudi Arabia - chief exporter not only of oil but of wahhabism - a militant expression of Islam and font of terrorism. Like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, America has the uncanny penchant for enabling and empowering our real enemies. With the Brotherhood there we are footing the bill in fact, that's right, people, with your and my taxes.

Here is the more complete story on this student by way of a follow up for the week of April 22, 2013: Our source is THE BLAZE television network which is doing heroic yeoman's work in delving into the charade we are being treated to and which even the likes of FOX News seems only somewhat interested in - that network is too busy paying attention to too many of the establishment crew of experts, although a couple of the analysts FOX uses are exemplary. THE BLAZE is the place to be if you are interested in getting news you can use from television and its web site. According to THE BLAZE:

A Saudi national  - the student who was the first to be said to be a "person of interest" in the Boston Marathon bombing was scheduled to be deported under section 212 3B - "Security and related grounds" - "Terrorist activities" after the bombing. But shortly thereafter,  The Blaze's Chief Content Officer, Joel Cheatwood, learned that the government may not deport the Saudi national, originally identified as Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi. Then the cover-up began in earnest through the same tried and true techniques, stall, obfuscate, deny, change stories, anything but the truth:

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would not answer questions [surprise, surprise!] on the matter when asked directly about it by Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) in the House on last Friday. An ICE official indicated that a separate Saudi national is in custody, but is "in no way" connected to the bombings. "A congressional source, however, says that the file on Alharbi was created, that he was 'linked' in some way to the Boston bombings (though it is unclear how), and that documents showing all this have been sent to Congress."

Key congressmen of the Committee on Homeland Security had requested a classified briefing with Napolitano. It looks very much as if she may have committed perjury. Fox News' Todd Starnes reported that "Alharbi was allegedly flagged on a terrorist watch list and granted a student visa without being properly vetted." But the intrigue is as insipid as it seems - powered by corrupt members of the administration who are engaging in wanton criminal acts, alienated from any sense of the moral rectitude this nation used to know it. It is Nixon redux. We now learn from The Blaze that "Alharbi's file was altered early Wednesday evening to disassociate him from the initial charges." As if this is not enough to raise the alarm, it then came to light that this Saudi national with important connections had obtained a visa to live and study in Findley, Ohio, which he then did not do, but rather, acquired roommates and an apartment in Revere, Massachusetts where he resided at the time of the Marathon bombings. There is much more, but we will let this suffice for this report here.

He is not the only strange case. Currently there are 75, 000 students of doubtful classification on visas in the United States, 15,000 of which are missing, that is, their status is unknown as to whereabouts or activity. But then, the older of the two bomber brothers had been flagged as suspect, yet he was able to travel freely abroad and back into America, even though Russia had warned our officials that he should be watched. Meanwhile you and I cannot board a plane without being stripped searched and this includes little old ladies who are dying and in wheel chairs and disabled children who are Americans.

Blaze "sources tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS to the DOJ and labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be discussed."

On Monday [April 22] Glenn Beck told his audience what "he knows about the Saudi connection to the Boston marathon bombings. It is a story that the mainstream media has all but completely ignored, though Beck says The Blaze's Chief Content Officer Joel Cheatwood reached out to numerous other networks in an effort to get the story out."

To further quote The Blaze:

"But now a number of congressional sources have confirmed that the story is as The Blaze reported last week, and Beck is presenting more pieces of the big picture. 'This week has changed me,' he said at the top of his radio program on Monday. 'The events in Boston changed me. The events in Washington around Boston changed me. We crossed an "extraordinarily disturbing threshold" last week, Beck said, but we know 'exactly who we're dealing with now.' "

The government's refusal to explain  with any credibility is not new, of course; neither is its underhanded dealings with the Saudis who appear to be calling the shots, just as they did under George Bush after 9/11. At that time 140 Saudi nationals were spirited out of the country to safety abroad without any explanation from our government.

Quoting The Blaze once more, text in bold added by me:

"While the media continues to look at what the causes were of these two guys, there are, at this hour, three people involved. The first one is the one we are going to address. Beck proceeded to highlight the background of the Saudi national first identified as a person of interest in the Boston bombings, Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, noting that the the NTC issued an event file calling for his deportation using section 212, 3B which is proven terrorist activity. We are not sure who actually tagged him, but we know it is very difficult to charge someone with this it has to be almost certain, Beck explained. It is the equivalent in civil society of charging someone with premeditated murder and seeking the death penalty, it is not thrown around lightly. Beck continued, noting that after Secretary of State John Kerry met with Saudi Foreign Minister Saud on Tuesday, the FBI began backtracking on the Saudi national from suspect, to person of interest, to witness, to victim, to nobody. Then, on Wednesday, President Obama had a chance encounter with Saudi Foreign Minister Saud and Saudi Ambassador Adel al-Jubeir Wednesday at 5:35 p.m. the file is altered, Beck said. This is unheard of, this is impossible in the timeline due to the severity of the charge:. You don't one day put a 212 3B charge against somebody with deportation, and then the next day take it off. It would require too much to do it. There are only two people that could revoke the deportation order  -the director of the NTC could do it after speaking with each department, the FBI, the ATC, etc. which is impossible to do in such a short period of time, or, somebody at the very highest levels of the State Department could do it. We don't have any evidence to tell you which one did it, Beck said.
 
"Congressman Duncan is in possession of the original event file along with other members of the House Homeland Security Committee, and have sent a formal letter of request (which we have a copy of) to Napolitano for a classified briefing on the Saudi national and the deportation order. Beck proceeded to highlight more key points: The Saudi national was allegedly allegedly- flagged-on-terror-watch-list and granted a student visa without being properly vetted. If, as an ICE official said last week, there is actually a second Saudi in custody, who is it? Beck asked. Why were there were no names, no pictures presented?

"The fact is, an event was created for one Abdul Rahman Ali AI-Harbi indicating he was to be deported for terrorism activity related to the Boston bombing. If this file was created with another Abdul Rahman Ali AI-Harbi in mind, don't you think we should know about it? Beck proceeded with more exclusive information; The Saudi student visa specifically allows him to go to school in Findley, Ohio. He has been in this country six months ... He has an apartment in Boston, Massachusetts. If this is a case of mistaken identity, then who is the person named in the file, with the same name, with the 3B charge? And If DHS was working with the person as a  source to out the bombers, then why was there a 3B Charge? Exclusive: Why wasn't the Congressional Committee on Homeland Security notified?

"Why are they being cut out of all information? This is protocol. We are working on the family connections, and there is more to come. Sources tell us this will most likely now be kicked from the DHS to the DOJ and labeled an ongoing investigation that can no longer be discussed. This will be the reason Napolitano won't answer the Homeland Security Committee's request for a briefing. Like Benghazi they have heavy into a disinformation campaign floating a variety of scenarios to confuse the media but that apparently doesn't take much to prevent the story from being pursued."

Make no mistake, folks, Saudi Arabia, not Al Qaeda, is the real, purduring source of what ails us on this front, yet we are in bed with them in more ways than one. The US is no longer adept at driving wise, hard bargains that benefit Americans; we are being had, conquered, one carefully planned step at a time. Even now I can hear the
roar of laughter in Riyadh.

The second prong of the siege of the West by Islam Rising is the Media Campaign as waged principally by CAIR and other like-minded organizations. As reported in a previous article here at Catholic Tradition:

CAIR is the acronym for The Council on American–Islamic Relations, a PR front group that presents the good face of Islam to the public. It has tentacles throughout government and the media that either knowingly or stupidly act as propaganda shills for Muslim extremists. CAIR has strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Both depend on preventing the public from seeing through their ultimate goals - Islam the dominant power and belief system in the world and the establishment of the Caliphate. Period. Only they cannot let us know this. They exploit Americans' lack of common sense and reason in re "discrimination" in order to mis-direct our attention and change our ideas about Islam. The term Islamphobia is bandied about as if we are all evil for rejecting elements of Islam or all of it, as we should. One CAIR honcho on one of their web sites some time ago boasted about the group's ability to get us to comply in so many words. CAIR - and or brother PR clansmen - also has its sinewy clutches into various financial institutions, etc. I suspect, although I cannot prove it right now, that CAIR has a hand in Common Core principles. Certainly at present the American government schools are pro-Islamic and anti-Christian, very important for CAIR. There was even a Supreme Court case that did not make it through Certiorari - in effect, the Islamists won big time in the New York schools because the Supreme Court permitted a lower court ruling favoring the favoritism of Islam in public schools over that of the Christians. Just think about this, folks!

One of the principal spokesmen for CAIR is Nihad Awad, who presents a polished, serene face of reason but his face is two. On the one hand he claims to decry the innocent loss of life, while on the other hand does not call on Moslems to join in an effort to discourage terrorist acts. When he comes on as a guest he makes every attempt to plug the supposed peace of Islam. He lacks credibility in these quarters, just as his predecessor, Ibrahim Hooper who seemed more strident and bellicose because of the force of his personality did. I am almost certain this is why Hooper has been replaced, or at least does not make as many guest appearances now in TVland. Awad is there to push the PR for Islamism first and foremost. Few in the media adequately address his ploy, if they see it in the first place. While I have my disagreements with FOX's Bill O'Reilly, he is to be commended for his astute perceptions of the real persona of Awad & Co., and does not permit them a forum for their spiel. The News Channel's Jeanine Pirro and Sean Hannity are two other hosts who are not taken in by CAIR's cunning and bravo to them as well! But the "Peace of Islam" agitprop has been effective. What else explains the left-tilting media's openly expressing the hope, immediately after the Boston bombings, that it was either a TEA Party member type or at least some White American, anybody but you know what. Openly without shame, imagine!

It may also partly explain Obama and his regime's obvious reluctance to associate any terrorism as Islamist. I say partly because Obama's father was Moslem and I am sure this is an important factor where he is concerned; but why the rest of his administration? The Fort Hood massacre is but "a workplace violence" and then there is the still unresolved savage attack in Benghazi under most peculiar circumstances, coupled with the intentional stonewalling by the State Department - the refusal to hand over vital records, except a brief look while under the eye of the officials themselves - no actual physical handouts to the Congressional Committee according to Rep. Ben Chavitz.

Elements of CAIR's propaganda points are issued under the pretext that to oppose their goals is an unworthy phobia or an unjust discriminatory stance which they call Islamphobia - they are adamant - insistent that the media drop the term Islamist, for instance, although to do so is to disarm Americans in the Islamists' favor - are found in the public schools as you just read supra; another example was a California school where the public students were forced to take a class in Islam, including Ramadan practices, while the same school would not permit even the name of Christ, no surprise there. And equally expected because we have to come to know its abject hypocrisy, the ACLU would not touch this one with the proverbial ten foot pole, you know the Anti-Christ Litigation Union, not the American Civil Liberties outfit they bill themselves as.

 Naturally enough, the regime and its allies have no problem identifying Christians who believe in the Bible as threats to national security. Hmmm ...

There have been skirmishes and trial runs such as these here and there over the past several years and we will see more of them as each time the Islamists get away with this because we let them in our cowardice and do-nothing policy, they will take it for granted that the public schools belong to them, not just their own madrassas. Which brings us to one particular, pernicious form, the Wahhabi - read Saudi Arabian schools which operate freely in the United States indoctrinating young Muslims into the more radicalized tenets.

My major source for this CAIR segment is the web site: http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=53029

The Cutting Edge has learned revealing, almost unbelievable, but all too believable, unfortunately for us, things about the close co-ordination between CAIR and the White House, et al, and I quote. text in bold added by me:

"These reports reveal the depth of the below-the-surface coordination between the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iranian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Libya and Jordan. This bloc of regimes and organizations is now becoming the greatest Islamist radical lobby ever to penetrate and infiltrate the White House, Congress, the State Department and the main decision making centers of the U.S. government. All of this is happening at a time when the US government is going through its most strategically dangerous period in modern times because of its need to confront the Iranian Mullahs regime, which is expanding in the Middle East, as well as penetrating the United States, via powerful and influential allies.

It looks like the near future will uncover many surprises after the fall of the Gaddafi regime, as we realize more and more that the popular revolts in the Arab world - and the Obama Administration's position towards them - were determined by political battles between various pressure groups in Washington. Moreover, pressures by these lobbying groups have left an impact on the region's events, the last of which was the canceling of the visit of Maronite Patriarch Rahi to Washington. A number of Arab and Western news agencies have leaked that one of “those who sought to cancel this visit was Dalia Mujahid, a top advisor on Islamic and Arab affairs at the State Department, who is of Egyptian origin. And that, said the reports, came at the request of the high command of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who wish to see the US Administration support the Islamist Sunni current."

My main sources for this next portion are The Sword and the Prophet, Serge Trifkovic, Regina Orthodox Press, 2002; and the web site:

http://americamagazine.org/issue/425/article/wahhabism-and-jihad

I cite from their article,  Wahhabism and Jihad:

"Since the heinous attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, the Bush administration has issued an unending stream of statements informing us that these barbarous crimes were committed by people who embrace a “perverted version of Islam” or by those who have 'hijacked Islam.' It is also often assumed that Islam is a religion of gentleness and peaceful behavior and that no true Muslim would commit such acts. From the Bush administration's point of view, it is undoubtedly necessary to generalize in this way, no matter what the truth may be. Coalitions must be built and maintained across the world, and Muslim allies or partners must be made to feel that they are not condemned en masse with the killers.

"But generalizations are always defective in some way, and this generalization about the nature of the faith and culture of more than a billion people is massively defective and a burden to sound analysis of the actual threat facing the United States."

What is the Wahhabi school and what is its origin?

For more than two centuries, Wahhabism has been Saudi Arabia's dominant faith. It is an austere form of Islam that insists on a literal interpretation of the Koran. Strict Wahhabis believe that all those who don't practice their form of Islam are heathens and enemies. Some Muslims say that Wahhabism's rigidity has led it to misinterpret and distort Islam, pointing to extremists such as Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. Wahhabism's explosive growth began in the 1970s when Saudi charities started "Supreme Savings" funding.

Wahhabi schools (madrassas) and mosques span from Islamabad to Culver City, California and the east coast in various states.

It began with its founder, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab who was born in 1703. Wahhab was a zealot who championed the revival of Islam during the Ottaman Empire's early decline. He wanted Arabia to be purified and return to what he believed were the true tenets of Islam. Like Mohammed he married an older, wealthy woman, upon whose death he had the resources to fund his movement. He was so Puritanical that he condemned even the decorative aspects of the mosque and wanted a strict interpretation, literal only, of the Koran, which included the cessation of veneration of Islam's "holy" persons and shrines. He wrote his blueprint in the Book of Unity. By the middle of the century his cause was seeing some success as he found a wealthy, influential partner in Muhammad ibn Saud, the leader of a powerful clan of central Arabia. By 1902  a brazen, adventuresome prince of the ibn Saud family with but 40 warriors on horseback seized control of Riyadh, which was the beginning to install Wahhabism as the dominant force in Arabia. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab is generally called Abdul Wahhab for short. His descendants still hold the house of Saud. Today Saudi Arabia is the most repressive Moslem nation. [Trifkovic]

A report by our own State Department provides us with a good idea of what is in store for us if the Islamists conquer the West, emphasis in bold added by me:

"Freedom of religion does not exist. Islam is the official religion, and all citizens must be Muslims. Neither the government nor society in general accepts the concepts of separation of religion and state, and such separation does not exist. Under Shari'a, conversion by a Muslim to another religion is considered apostasy. Public apostasy is a crime punishable by death if the accused does not recant. Islamic religious education is mandatory in public schools at all levels. All children receive religious instruction. ... Citizens do not have the right to change their government. The Council of Senior Islamic Scholars ... reviews the government's public policies for compliance with Shari'a. The government [views] Islamic law as the only necessary guide to protect human rights. There is legal and systemic discrimination based on sex and religion." [U.S. Department of State, Saudi Arabia: Country Reports on Human Rights -2000. Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 23, 2001.]

Ultimately we are being undermined from within for the students are being converted from Americanism to Islamist guerillas, if not out and out terrorists, bent on total conversion of this country to Islam one way or the other and the establishment eventually of Shari'a Law dominant over western law and its natural law basis.

Some of the Mosques, whether of the Wahhab sect or not are troublesome for they serve as radicalization, even recruiting facilities as do some Imams who serve in prison ministry. One such mosque has been much in the news since last week:

The Boston Mosque, the Islamic Society of Boston temporarily threw out the elder of the two Boston terrorists - this calculated move made the Society look good to the media. Actually it was for only 4 days and he was back in as a full member. He was expelled for those few days because he wanted to support the celebration of the US Fourth of July, an anathema to the Mosque VIPs. [Source: THE BLAZE TV]

On Tuesday, the 24th of April, Glenn Beck interviewed the ever intrepid Patrick Poole, a terrorist expert - not a regular columnist though - with PJ Media, Voices for a Free America:

http://pjmedia.com/

According to Poole, the Mosque had as one of its board members a man who now heads the Muslim Brotherhood efforts in Syria. The Mosque has long had ties with the Brotherhood. In fact, according to USA Today "Several people who attended the Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge, Mass., have been investigated for Islamic terrorism." [Oren Dorell, USA TODAY
10:47 a.m. EDT April 24, 2013.]


This concludes our overview surrounding the Boston events portion of the series.

If you want a more thorough report on the danger of Wahhabism, The Free Republc web site has an excellent page HERE:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173310/posts

I presume it is still online - it was posted in July of 2004.

Part 2: Islam Rising: The Sword will be on line this week, most likely on Friday, April 26 by 9 AM, EDST.




BACK                                              FORWARD

MAIN INDEX  -------------------- E-MAIL


www.catholictradition.org/islamist-watch1.htm