Came for Savage ......
A representative of the British
government has banned Michael Savage from that country. He has been
listed among such real haters as a Hezbollah terrorist, a leader of
Hamas, white supremacists, former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard, and
Russian skinheads, now in prison for murder. This is a hateful,
And on this blacklist by Home Secretary Jacqui
Smith, in an "in-your-face" announcement, Smith has added Michael
Savage. Since there are no crimes committed by Savage, it can only be
surmised that he appears there because he is deemed hateful and may
stir up feelings of hate and incitement to violence.
often yells at those he thinks are steering us into socialism, or
worse. He sometimes is strident. He is articulate and makes his
case. There have been callers who would like to go farther than that,
but Savage has carefully drawn that line beyond which he will not go.
He will not call for violence, nor will he stand for callers who would
like to do so. His is a war of words, nothing more.
Now that we
live in a New World Order, globalism reigns supreme. What is happening
overseas has more importance than ever. However, instead of being able
to count on traditional allies, we find the government of Britain
colluding with a push toward punishing so-called "hate" crimes. Canada
has already succumbed to this push, stifling religious opinions that do
not toe their particular line.
The European Union has become
almost monolithic. Britain's representatives have betrayed the common
man in forcing this union. It is largely hated because the citizens
have little input as to how they will be governed. However, the elites
that run the country have learned well how to leverage a small amount
of power. It is the same all over the EU, to a large extent. The EU,
having the blueprint, and having had time to iron out the problems,
stands ready to help implement our own union, the North American
Union. Our grand plan is to merge Mexico, Canada and the U.S. into the
Connecting the dots, we can see that our own domestic "hate"
legislation is being pushed along even now. The Democrats have
always wanted it. Now they think they are in a position to ram it
through. The "victims", the beneficiaries of this legislation, were
chosen based on "actual or perceived ... sexual orientation, gender
Representatives Louis Gohmert R-Texas, and Steve King
R-Iowa, tried to have congressional Democrats define "sexual
orientation" in this bill, but were refused.
This is so vaguely
defined that some have dubbed it "The Pedophile Protection" Act. King
and Gohmert also tried to add an amendment that pedophiles were not
protected under the law. Again, Democrats voted against this provision.
thinks that this is a national effort by homosexual activists to not
only have the freedom to choose their lifestyle, but be able to demand
that approval be given and that those who don't agree with their
particular behavior will be silenced by law.
We saw the hatred
toward those in California who worked to pass legislation stating that
marriage is between a man and a woman. Elderly people who carried
signs were accosted and their signs were ripped from their fingers. An
elderly woman had a cross taken from her. That was her own property.
No tolerance of opinion there, although they prate about it.
we were told that homosexuals just wanted to be left alone; just to
have respect, just to have tolerance. How far we have come.
seem to be particularly hated and the homosexual lobby would like
nothing more than to silence them and their pastors. Canada is just a
little ahead of us in that regard. Catholics have been a favorite
target. Churches have been disrupted in their services. Wild looking
people in garish garb run throughout the pews, scaring children. Holy
sacraments are thrown to the floor and stomped upon. Condoms are thrown
through the air and lesbians kiss on the altar. These attacks were
premeditated, planned, staged (with props), and executed. This is
tolerance they are asking. This is hateful behavior. The Catholics are
under attack and do not always know if actual shooting will be used
against them, the violence is so intense. The attacks are calculated
to instill fear in those under siege.
There is a two pronged
attack on free speech. The other is the so-called "fairness doctrine"
which was trotted out recently there again, this has been a favorite
to be put into law by Democrats. They think they have the power to do
it now. More commentators have noticed this and condemned it because
it is familiar to them. However, hate speech laws are not as familiar.
wise man said that with politics there are no coincidences. Accusing
hatred of those who just want to give an opinion comes right back to
Michael Savage. Since we are all "citizens of the world", according to
some, the globalists zero on in those who speak against them. One of
the loudest is Savage. To take him on calls for a certain "chutzpah",
unless you know that your allies are very strong. I think that Smith
knew of Savage, and his been egged on by the globalists in our
country. Usually, the modus operandi
is to whittle away at some of the
weaker structures until the opposition falls. With Savage, Smith has
taken on the top.
It is a gamble. We have seen that he will
not be intimidated. He now has a suit against Smith. Discovery should
prove interesting. What little we are allowed to see in Britain lets
us know that the politicians are quite corrupt. Ms. Smith herself is
not squeaky clean. Did someone high up in our government give the "go
ahead" for the action taken against Savage? With several millions of
listeners, Savage is a threat, unlike their usual MSM puppets.
importantly, how will We the People respond? Everyone who writes or
speaks should be alarmed. When laws are enacted for one set of people,
there is favoritism that should never happen in a free Republic. If
you can be sued just because somebody charges that they
that their "feelings" have been hurt, the slippery slope is greased.
is credited with saying "I do not agree with what you have to say, but
I'll defend to the death your right to say it". To the death.
There is time to speak out and make allies. There is
time to let our representatives know killing free speech is not
acceptable. These reps seem to only fear one thing: a loss of power.
They respond when enough let them know to change their votes.
have come for Michael Savage; let them find a phalanx of Savage
allies. If Savage is left to “twist in the wind” alone, there will
soon be no champions of free speech, whether you like the speech or not.