THE PAPACY: AN EXPOSE OF THE MASONIC INVASION
Based on the Writings of Father Luigi Villa, Th.D
and Dr. Franco Adessa
Compiled and Integrated by Pauly Fongemie
THE BEATIFICATION MANEUVERS FOR PAUL
VI AND JOHN PAUL II
by Pauly Fongemie
In his book, THE PERMANENT INSTRUCTION OF THE ALTA VENDITA: A Masonic Blueprint for the Subversion of the Catholic Church [TAN BOOKS AND PUBLISHERS], John Vennari cites from the actual document, once secret, now exposed, proving the plan of the Masons to infiltrate and subvert the Church. Both Pope Pius IX [1846-78] and Pope Leo XIII [1878-1903] asked that this document by the Masons be published. Freemasonry did not require a Pontiff who was a member of the Masonic sect or lodge, but one in heart and soul with its ideas. The strategy was and is to infect Catholic leaders with Liberalism, the very air that Masonry breathes, under the "mantle" of Catholicism. As for the Liberals themselves they have been forthright in admitting how successful they have been since and during Vatican II. Some Catholics, who describe themselves as "Conservative" do not believe any of this, but that is because they do not dare to; they need not pay attention to Mr. Vennari or Father Villa, they have only to listen to the Masonically seduced hierarchy and theologians. For instance, Annibale Bugnini, an actual Mason, and the "architect" of the Novus Ordo, said that with its promulgation "The Catholic Church has been conquered." One of the liberal periti at Vatican II, Yves Congar said, "The Church has had, peacefully, its October [Communist] Revolution." He went on to admit that Vatican II's Declaration on Religious Liberty was really the opposite of the Magisterium handed down through the ages and exposited so brilliantly by Pope Pius IX, pictured to the left, in his Syllabus of Errors.
When to our horror we were notified in the press that the Holy See was going to beatify John Paul II and then Paul VI it was simply inexplicable. Some of us had read Randy Engels monumental compendium [The Rite of Sodomy] on the impurity and foul odor of the vice of sodomy that had penetrated deep into the hierarchy all the way to Rome. The record on Paul VI WAS SO QUESTIONABLE THAT WHEN WE LEARNED THAT THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATE aspect of a cause for sainthood was not to be forthcoming in the same manner as before, for obvious reasons, this was such a scandal it is still raging today. But Rome pays no heed for it has long ago surrendered any semblance of a conscience, save a few courageous Bishops and Cardinals who are still thoroughly Catholic and know well their duty before God. As for John Paul II, we witnessed to our heartbreak and anguish his do-nothing policy except in a few notable cases that were the exception that served to prove the rule. He presided over the swift decline of the Church and a great loss of souls. Christ did not tell us never to judge - He gave us the rules for judging, one of which is "By their fruits, thou shalt know them" This was for our benefit because we need to know whom to avoid in order not to be led astray by lying words. How could heroic sanctity - the standard of the devil's advocate process - be determined for one who was so enamored of novelty that went against so much of Sacred Tradition, who permitted the worst abuses to the faith to flourish? It could not and the Vatican as much as said so in a round-about way, saying it was not making John Paul II a Saint because of heroic sanctity, but for historic reasons, another way of saying because they needed to validate that which cannot ever square with Tradition, the disastrous policies following from Vatican II and the inevitable diminution of doctrine and Catholic practice as a result.
It would all be a travesty.
For an online book review of Paul VI Beatified? by Father Villa, go to Catholic Family News Here.
Now we continue with Fr. Villa and Dr. Adessa:
Freemasonry wanted her man Paul VI on the altars of Sainthood, along with John XXIII in order to validate the very nature of Vatican II itself, which spirit was anti-Tradition in practice and results, tailored made for the Masonic revolution to overcome the Church, as if it were a supernatural gift of Heaven. Sainthood for the two Popes of Vatican II would do the trick. Here is how it went in the case of Paul VI:
During the proceedings of the 35th Assembly of the Italian Bishops [CEI], Cardinal Ruini [see prior page] announced the decision to "introduce the cause of beatification of Paul VI" before the Pontiff and Bishops. On May 13, 1992, as President of the CEI and the Vicar of the Pope issued an edict which among other things declared: "WE invite all individual believers to communicate or submit to the diocesan tribunal of the Vicariate of Rome any 'news' from which we can argue to some extent [note this phrase] against the reputation of sanctity of the said 'Servant of God.' "
[Of course there would never ever be any actual examination worth the name and cherished as a part of the safeguards of Tradition. Any hint of possible scandal, even a taint had always been scrupulously avoided. It isn't that all Saints lived impeccable lives from the beginning, but it is the certainty of knowing of a point in time when the person under consideration for the honors of the altar ceased living a life that excluded holiness, said time also being one of penance. Perhaps one of the best known is St. Augustine. We are not suggesting that Paul VI went to Hell, not at all, only that it would give scandal to those who are weak in the faith if he were raised to such honors, for the signal would be given that one can be a flagrant notorious sinner of the most degenerate kind and count on a death bed reprieve - knowable only to God if it existed - from these consequences. This would teach them that one can tempt the Holy Spirit and commit the sin of presumption without concern. This is why until recently - when ecclesiastical politics and an unholy agenda became paramount - the process for Sainthood has been so rigorous in general; there are cases of Martyrdom or known saintliness that is undeniable where the process has been slightly modified, but even here, such as with St. Thomas More and others, it took centuries. It has not been the Tradition of the Church to have a Saint "factory", i.e. in an official capacity on a fast track - anyone who dies in the state of grace is a Saint by definition as he is at least in Purgatory, although the Church cannot declare official Sainthood for everyone because it is simply impossible given the circumstances of human limitations. But now thanks to the Masonic subversion, the "Church" in its official capacity, has dared to breach Sacred Tradition in almost every aspect, with such impious audacity, as to court the chastisement of God. We know the Vatican has been up to extreme mischief because it has reduced the number of required miracles, and at that, some of the supposed miracles would have been deemed questionable in a more prudent time. What the Vatican has been undertaking here makes a mockery of all that is holy. (P. Fongemie)]
Father Villa wanted to have matters clarified. On May 25 he telephoned at the Secretariat of State Msgr. Sarale, his faithful friend, asking about this decision of Ruini. He replied to Father Villa that the decision was "a forced coup" by Card. Ruini, because most of the Italian Bishops would not have a part of it!
And so the cause of beatification continued forward until 1997. This was when the three names of Paul VI's last homosexual lovers were sent to the Postulator by Card. Palazzini, who was an authority in the field because he had in his possession two binders filled with documentation demonstrating the impure and unnatural vice of Paul VI. So Father Villa wrote a letter to the Postulator, who refused to take proper consideration and normal procedures in such a situation.
Thus Father felt forced to write the definitive expose on Paul VI, the book, Paul VI Beatified? released in February 1998. The first publication was for over 5,000 copies, which were distributed to the Roman Pontiff, Bishops, and thousands of Italian priests. The Vicar of the Pope, Card. Ruini, was infuriated. He wanted to know who had financed this endeavor and its distribution. When advised of the fury in the Vatican, Father Villa, smiled and said, "We should respond to the Vicar of His Holiness, that the lenders are Three Persons, and their names are: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit."
Dr. Adessa informs us that reaction to the book was one of a violent ferocity. Some had sent the books back with the pages torn out and or the most wicked sort of epithets appended. Dr. Adessa kept some of these, with Father Villa throwing out the most vulgar of them. The diocese of Brescia was "in turmoil". The Bishop at that time was Msgr. Bruno Foresti, who promised his clergy a refutation in the form of a book would be forthcoming. After more than a dozen years that book has as yet to see the light of day if it even exists.
But it is certain Father Villa's book temporarily blocked the Beatification of Paul VI. No one was able to refute its contents, there were simply too many facts, actual quotations, documents and pictures.
[I am not going to discuss details about Paul VI's personal flagrant indiscretions - to use a phrase - but I will cite a few quotes concerning the theological ideas and his Catholic commitment, his Masonic ideals. This is what Father Villa did essentially. I can use only a few, because the book, referred to supra, is copyrighted, unlike the book by Dr. Adessa, about Father Villa. We encourage you to purchase a copy for yourself. P. Fongemie]
We will begin with a quote from a Mason - the funeral oration by the former Grand Master of Rome's Grand Orient, Giordano Giustiniani - upon the death of Paul VI:
"To us, it is the death of him who made the condemnation of Clement XII and of his successors fall. That is, it is the first time - in the history of modern Freemasonry - that the Head of the greatest Western religion dies not in a state of hostility with the Freemasons! ... For the first time in history, the Freemasons can par respect to the tomb of a Pope, without any ambiguities or contradction." [La Rivista Massonica, ed. n. 5, July 1978, p. 290.]
Father Villa points out to the reader that there are those who claim that Freemasonry has "changed." But Pope Pius XII knew better.
In 1949 the Supreme Congregation Holy Office issued this:
"Freemasonry of the Scottish rite [33 degree Masonry - P.F.] falls under the condemnation issued by the Church against Freemasonry in general, and there is no reason to grant any discrimination in favor of that category of Freemason."
"Since nothing has come about that would solicit a change in this matter, in the decisions of the Holy See, the provisions of the Canon law retain their full validity, for any type of Freemasony whatsoever." [Same, April 20, 1949.]
[Even after the attempt to gloss over specific membership in Freemasonry in the 1983 updated Canon Law, the Holy See had to issue a clarification:]
["Because of the possibility of spreading among the faithful the erroneous opinion that membership in a Masonic lodge was lawful, it felt that it was its duty to make known to them the authentic thought of the Church in this regard and to warn them about a membership incompatible with the Catholic faith." (Nov. 26, 1983) - added by P. F.]
Father Villa clearly informs the reader that until Vatican II, the approach of the Church was always coherent: "The condemnation of Freemasonry was because of its tendency to destroy the religious order and the Christian social order, even if it presents itself under the mask of tolerance ... " [PVIB?, p. 116]
The very close friend - in fact called "his greatest friend" of Paul VI was Jean Guitton who wrote extensively about him. It is stunning to learn that such a great friend would reveal so much that was not praiseworthy. Among Guitton's exposition of the qualities of Paul VI were these admissions:
In the book Paul VI Guitton wrote, "I noticed how his thoughts were of a secular kind. With him one was not in the presence of a 'cleric', but of a layman, promoted, unexpectedly, to the papacy." [Ed. Paoline, p. 21]
The perennial Traditional teaching of the Church has always been to know, serve and love God in this world in order to spend eternity with Him. If one truly loves God, one also loves those He created in His Own image and likeness, for they too are loved by Him and have souls to save. But Paul VI had an obsession that was worldly: "To know God one has to know man." The reverse. This sentence is taken from the closing Address to the Council, November 14, 1970.
Paul VI, in the same Address added: "All these doctrinal riches (of the Council) aim at one and one thing only: to serve man."
And this is precisely the orientation of the Church ever since, man first, not God!
It is also the orientation of Masonry, the United Nations, the New World Order.
In his closing Address to the Council at its close, Paul VI included this in his paean to Man:
"… we call upon those who term themselves modern humanists, and who have renounced the transcendent value of the highest realities, to give the Council credit for one quality and to recognize our own new type of humanism; we, too, in fact, we more than any others, honor man; we have the Cult of Man”.
This was the idea that influenced the Council's Religious Freedom document, a distorted presentation of true religious freedom, which was unified with Gaudium et Spes, The Church in the World Today. Paul VI said:
"Another point we must stress is this: all this rich teaching (of the Council) is channeled in one direction, THE SERVICE OF MANKIND, of every condition in every weakness and need ..."
The coup d'etat was this phrase: " ... a knowledge of man is a prerequisite for knowledge of God."
Thus, Man first, God second.
This is idolatry!
Contrast this with Pope St. Pius X's E Supremi, Oct. 4, 1903:
 "... Such, in truth, is the audacity and the wrath employed everywhere in persecuting religion, in combating the dogmas of the faith, in brazen effort to uproot and destroy all relations between man and the Divinity! While, on the other hand, and this according to the same apostle is the distinguishing mark of Antichrist, man has with infinite temerity put himself in the place of God, raising himself above all that is called God; in such wise that although he cannot utterly extinguish in himself all knowledge of God, he has contemned God's majesty and, as it were, made of the universe a temple wherein he himself is to be adored. "He sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself as if he were God" (II. Thess. ii., 2).
 "But, Venerable Brethren, we shall never, however much we exert ourselves, succeed in calling men back to the majesty and empire of God, except by means of Jesus Christ. "No one," the Apostle admonishes us, "can lay other foundation than that which has been laid, which is Jesus Christ." (I. Cor., iii., II.) It is Christ alone "whom the Father sanctified and sent into this world" (Is. x., 36), "the splendor of the Father and the image of His substance" (Hebr. i., 3), true God and true man: without whom nobody can know God with the knowledge for salvation, "neither doth anyone know the Father but the Son, and he to whom it shall please the Son to reveal Him." (Matth. xi., 27.) Hence it follows that to restore all things in Christ and to lead men back to submission to God is one and the same aim. To this, then, it behooves Us to devote Our care -- to lead back mankind under the dominion of Christ; this done, We shall have brought it back to God. When We say to God We do not mean to that inert being heedless of all things human which the dream of materialists has imagined, but to the true and living God, one in nature, triple in person, Creator of the world, most wise Ordainer of all things, Lawgiver most just, who punishes the wicked and has reward in store for virtue."
In Australia Paul VI continued with his Man-centered orientation:
"We have trust in man. We believe in the store of goodness in everyone’s heart. We know the motives of justice, truth, renewal, progress and brotherhood that lie at the root of so many wonderful undertakings, and even of so many protests and, unfortunately, of violence at times." [St. Mary's Cathedral, Dec. 2, 1970]
Again, this kind of talk is imbued with the aims of Freemasonry.
Masonry is in of itself a "religion". It tells itself that there is but one true religion and it is therefore a natural one: the cult of humanity [or man]. Stated in "The World of Freemasonry". 1870.
The cessation of the beatification process was temporary as we stated. Without considering the merits of the facts produced, and since there was no actual answer to refute them, the only way out to reinvigorate the process for Paul VI was to use the weight of papal authority. Only a visit by the Pope to Brescia could revive the process. And this would occur in September of 1998, the ostensible reason was for the beatification of Giuseppe Tovini of that city, which was "associated with the beatification cause of Paul VI."
However, Fr. Villa did not give up, before that event. In August he wrote a letter to Sec. of State Card. Angelo Sodano, asking for the papal visit to be canceled, citing the numerous favorable responses to the book PVIB? - although the most serious reason was "the damage the Church would suffer from an uncaring attitude of a Pope" given the harsh details that had come to light. Father acknowledged the strong tone and that it was difficult for the clergy to accept the facts as they were not accustomed to such forceful language. As Father put it, it "was the violence of love" for the Church and that such a "violence" was a duty when the strikes against the Church were such as they were. He said that it would be cowardice to prefer silence! "One who really loves the Church can't fail to speak out when one sees it in disarray." We added that this book was for everyone except those who have little love for the Truth, for those not sickened by superficiality who for those who deceive themselves into being content with misconception. He continued: "Your Eminence! Jesus rebuked them, then, for their grave infidelity, at the pastoral level. And He scolded them for their own harmful 'tolerance' toward certain disrupters of the faith, leaving them to operate unhindered, so they share the responsibility for those errors that led the faithful astray."
He likened this failure of duty to Paul VI, asking, Did he not give free rein to all the progressives, more or less heretical, allowing them to uproot the faith from its foundation?
And again: "How could the Pope [John Paul II] still make a defense, even if rhetorically-academic, of Paul VI after what I wrote and documented on him and after the 'letter' that I sent to all the Italian episcopate - a month ago! - in which I brought back the photo of Paul VI with his left hand which shows well-marked, the 'five-pointed star" or Masonic pentagram, as it had been carved on the first panel of the original, which appeared on the "bronze Door" of St. Peter's Basilica, in Rome and also appeared on the Special Insert of 'Osservatore Romano' of September 25, 1977?"
The request was denied and John Paul II went to Brescia to receive the fate of the cause of the beatification for Paul VI. So Father Villa published a second book, Paul VI, a Pope on Trial?, a continuation of the first book. But this time the reaction was more subdued.
A Masonic Memorial to Paul VI
Dr. Adessa tells us that this was not the first time that Freemasonry used its authority in re the Papacy to trample on proven truths and to impose its own agenda or to overcome any vestige of hostility from an entire population.
In 1984, the personal secretary of Paul VI, the Mason, Msgr. Pasquale Macchi decided to erect a monument to Paul VI, in the Square of the Shrine of Our Lady, Crowned, on th Sacred Mount of Varese, north of Milan.
The monument to Paul VI on the Sacred Mount of Varese. The official explanation for the sheep with five legs is to "to fill space" an absurdity as anyone knows. In Masonry the number 5 is associated with rebirth. Since Masonry is anti-Christ and Christ is symbolized by a lamb. [I presume this has something to do with salvation through Masonry. Fr. Villa does not fully explain this lamb. The fact that a 5-legged lamb is on a known Masonic monument tells us much.]
The monument was inaugurated on May 24, 1986 in the presence of Foreign Minister Giulio Andreotti and blessed by Cardinal Agostino Casaroli, Secretary of State of the Vatican. Casaroli was definitely a Mason as Father Villa authenticated. The inspiration for this grotesque statue was Msgr. Pasquale Macchi, who lauded Paul VI "as the Supreme Head of Freemasonry" and glorified him for "his three acts of Masonic justice" - the betrayal of Christ, of the Church and of the history of the Christian nations. The three betrayals are carved in the monument.
The base of the monument is composed of ten identical sectors, representing the 10 divine attributes of Adam-Man God of the Jewish Kabala. The Masonic historian, Albert Pike wrote about the importance of the Kabala and its symbols to Masonry - the 33 degrees are heavily bonded to the Kabala. The Bnai Brith organization is the Masonic wing of Jewry. Macchi also hailed Paul VI as the "Jewish Pope".
Andreotti was also a Mason. He is not on Father Villa's list because Father Villa's list consists of Cardinals of the Church who were documented Masonic members. Andreotti enjoyed a special deep friendship with Paul VI.
The book by Fr. Villa, Paul VI Beatifiied?, was published twelve years later. However, the matter of the non-suitability of Paul VI for canonization, due to public scandal was not yet over. In 2003 Fr. Villa released his third book, The New Church of Paul VI.
This time, although the book was devastating, instead of fury, there was only silence! Fr. Villa received a threatening phone call from an unknown person, who told him: "When you are dead, we will put Paul VI on the altars."
Before we continue with the next part, we ought to include the following facts concerning Paul VI:
One of the many betrayals - of which the three cited above belong to the worst - there is one that stands out and that is the betrayal of Our Lady of Fatima. On May 13, 1976, Paul VI traveled to Fatima, ostensibly to implore the Virgin Mary for the mercy of God before the throng of Catholics who still maintained the faith. It was the fiftieth anniversary of the Apparitions. Instead of imploring Our Lady he began by insulting the President of Portugal by not following protocol with Salazar, known for his deep faith. He greeted him as an ordinary citizen, thereby humiliating all of Portugal. Even those liberals present noted the overt contempt. He then celebrated a cold and hasty Mass, which was stammered. In his speech he barely alluded to the Message of Fatima, instead used his time to speak of ecumenism - most of his time there was with non-Catholics. Catholics were essentially shunned for all practical purposes. Interestingly only two Protestants showed up for his meeting, which disappointed him - and, no, he was not there to convert them, nor to console his flock waiting for nothing.
Then he would not visit the place of the Apparitions, the Cova da Iria as is the custom. When before a statue of Our Lady of Fatima, he did not acknowledge her, but immediately saluted "the people". He did not say the Rosary as is the custom, not so much as a public Hail Mary! Which was duly noted by those in observance.
He seemed to ignore Our Lady all together as he did with Sister Lucia. She had requested to speak with him, which he refused. She was weeping when she made her request. All he did was tell her it was not a good time, to tell it to the Bishop who could pass it on to him and he blessed her. Six days earlier he had plenty of time to meet with the actresses Claudia Cardinale and Gina Lollobrigida at St. Peter's with a visible interest with what they had to say. Imagine! And on May 17 he had time for the two Jewish women Presidents of the covert organization known as "the Temple of Understanding". Paul VI's ideas of Our Lady's peace plan from Heaven were not that of prayer and penance, but progress, converging with Masonic plans of the "new world order" built by man upon man, not for the glory of God. In his public prayer at the Vatican he extolled man 6 times, referring to God but once.
After this insult to Heaven, little wonder at all that the world continued to undergo such savage devastation! Especially the precipitous decline of the Church.
Click the forward button below for Section 3, What Freemasonry Did to Padre Pio's Memory.
All graphic accessories on this page copyrighted by Catholic Tradition.